<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mission:Impossible III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html</link>
	<description>seanobrien.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: :: Summer Shudder :: seanobrien.org // OB1og</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>:: Summer Shudder :: seanobrien.org // OB1og</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 05:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-435</guid>
		<description>[...] Mission: Impossible III started us off and despite the hands of JJ Abrams, it was a disappointment. I&#8217;m pretty sure it was, wasn&#8217;t it? Well, that&#8217;s how I remember it now. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was good, Felicity bought it unexpectedly and Ethan&#8217;s wife was muy bonita. John Woo&#8217;s M:I 2 stands out better in my mind than this one, but then again, if I watched them together, maybe that won&#8217;t be the case. I guess a DVD rental will tell the tale, but if I do like it more, I may have to purchase it since I do own two. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mission: Impossible III started us off and despite the hands of JJ Abrams, it was a disappointment. I&#8217;m pretty sure it was, wasn&#8217;t it? Well, that&#8217;s how I remember it now. Phillip Seymour Hoffman was good, Felicity bought it unexpectedly and Ethan&#8217;s wife was muy bonita. John Woo&#8217;s M:I 2 stands out better in my mind than this one, but then again, if I watched them together, maybe that won&#8217;t be the case. I guess a DVD rental will tell the tale, but if I do like it more, I may have to purchase it since I do own two. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ed Zone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aisle Be Back</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ed Zone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aisle Be Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-183</guid>
		<description>[...] Sure I swore off reviewing media (films, books, games) citing career burnout, but in reading through Sean&#8217;s recent reviews of The Breakup, MI:3 and games like Kameo and Call of Duty 2, I decided that perhaps I had a bit more fuel in the tank to take pen to paper (or poker to pixel as it were) and jot down my thoughts on all things pop-culture. As a bit of a compromise to myself, I shall eschew the traditional review structure for something a bit more conversational. While I&#8217;ll try to tread carefully; beware, here there may be spoilers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sure I swore off reviewing media (films, books, games) citing career burnout, but in reading through Sean&#8217;s recent reviews of The Breakup, MI:3 and games like Kameo and Call of Duty 2, I decided that perhaps I had a bit more fuel in the tank to take pen to paper (or poker to pixel as it were) and jot down my thoughts on all things pop-culture. As a bit of a compromise to myself, I shall eschew the traditional review structure for something a bit more conversational. While I&#8217;ll try to tread carefully; beware, here there may be spoilers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 03:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Well, I agree with you on Woo and &lt;em&gt;Face/Off&lt;/em&gt;. Definitely his best American film. I&#039;m not real sure why you are taking me to task though. I just thought that Woo&#039;s take on M:i was better than Abrams&#039;, but really, not by much. Since we are ranking things tonight, I&#039;ll go with this order for his American films:
1. Face/Off
2. Hard Target
3. M:i:2
4. Broken Arrow
&lt;ol&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;
I haven&#039;t seen the rest. As for his *imports,* I&#039;ll never be able to choose between &lt;em&gt;The Killer&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Hard Boiled&lt;/em&gt;. They are both so great and I hold them higher in regard than &lt;em&gt;Face/Off&lt;/em&gt;.

As for Raimi, he&#039;s clearly elevated his game throughout the years, if only because he got Katie Holmes nekkid. Seriously though, I am eagerly anticipating &lt;em&gt;Spiderman 3&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I agree with you on Woo and <em>Face/Off</em>. Definitely his best American film. I&#8217;m not real sure why you are taking me to task though. I just thought that Woo&#8217;s take on M:i was better than Abrams&#8217;, but really, not by much. Since we are ranking things tonight, I&#8217;ll go with this order for his American films:<br />
1. Face/Off<br />
2. Hard Target<br />
3. M:i:2<br />
4. Broken Arrow</p>
<ol></ol>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the rest. As for his *imports,* I&#8217;ll never be able to choose between <em>The Killer</em> and <em>Hard Boiled</em>. They are both so great and I hold them higher in regard than <em>Face/Off</em>.</p>
<p>As for Raimi, he&#8217;s clearly elevated his game throughout the years, if only because he got Katie Holmes nekkid. Seriously though, I am eagerly anticipating <em>Spiderman 3</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/2006/06/missionimpossible-iii.html#comment-156</guid>
		<description>This film was like one of those Hostess Flaky Puff&#039;s. Enjoyable while before my eyes - but light as air and instantly forgettable days later.

I echo Sean&#039;s comments on the whole. The film played out like a big-screen reworking of Alias. That&#039;s probably a breath of fresh air for MI fans who are Alias newbies - but to someone who has watched Alias religiously through its 5 years, I felt I&#039;d seen so much of this done better on a much smaller budget. I guess I expected more.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman did not disappoint. He has precious few scenes but each one is charged. He&#039;s like a rampaging pit bull. I like the move towards a thuggish lout in favor of the Eurotrash terrorist we&#039;ve come to expect in these endeavors. Speaking of villains, his greatest work has to be as the porn purveyor in Punch Drunk Love. Seek that flick out - specifically for his &quot;Did you just tell me to F myself?&quot; rant.

I do take Sean to task for one thing. MI-2 has lost something in the years. It&#039;s arguably one of Woo&#039;s worst films (or was until he did the painfully bad Windtalkers). Where Sam Raimi has matured as a filmmaker - relying less on the flashy gimmickry that amplified his lower budget efforts (Evil Dead series) in favor of solid cinematic story-telling in the Spiderman series (and of course, A Simple Plan) - Woo seems stuck in that groove where he&#039;s repeating the same riff. The flurry of doves bursting through fireballs got old around Hard Target. Woo&#039;s best American film is Face-Off, simply because that film displayed audacity and verve typically unseen in Hollywood summer fare. I credit some of that on Nic Cage. Afterall, his &quot;put down the f&#039;n bunny&quot; in Con Air elevates that flick to Shakespeare. Anyway, MI-2 drags for the first half with a weak-ass Cruise clone in Dougray Scott (the one decent thing about MI-2 is it tied Scott up - thereby relinquishing his hold on the role of Wolverine, which then went to newbie Hugh Jackman.)

As for MI-3, catch it On Demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film was like one of those Hostess Flaky Puff&#8217;s. Enjoyable while before my eyes &#8211; but light as air and instantly forgettable days later.</p>
<p>I echo Sean&#8217;s comments on the whole. The film played out like a big-screen reworking of Alias. That&#8217;s probably a breath of fresh air for MI fans who are Alias newbies &#8211; but to someone who has watched Alias religiously through its 5 years, I felt I&#8217;d seen so much of this done better on a much smaller budget. I guess I expected more.</p>
<p>Phillip Seymour Hoffman did not disappoint. He has precious few scenes but each one is charged. He&#8217;s like a rampaging pit bull. I like the move towards a thuggish lout in favor of the Eurotrash terrorist we&#8217;ve come to expect in these endeavors. Speaking of villains, his greatest work has to be as the porn purveyor in Punch Drunk Love. Seek that flick out &#8211; specifically for his &#8220;Did you just tell me to F myself?&#8221; rant.</p>
<p>I do take Sean to task for one thing. MI-2 has lost something in the years. It&#8217;s arguably one of Woo&#8217;s worst films (or was until he did the painfully bad Windtalkers). Where Sam Raimi has matured as a filmmaker &#8211; relying less on the flashy gimmickry that amplified his lower budget efforts (Evil Dead series) in favor of solid cinematic story-telling in the Spiderman series (and of course, A Simple Plan) &#8211; Woo seems stuck in that groove where he&#8217;s repeating the same riff. The flurry of doves bursting through fireballs got old around Hard Target. Woo&#8217;s best American film is Face-Off, simply because that film displayed audacity and verve typically unseen in Hollywood summer fare. I credit some of that on Nic Cage. Afterall, his &#8220;put down the f&#8217;n bunny&#8221; in Con Air elevates that flick to Shakespeare. Anyway, MI-2 drags for the first half with a weak-ass Cruise clone in Dougray Scott (the one decent thing about MI-2 is it tied Scott up &#8211; thereby relinquishing his hold on the role of Wolverine, which then went to newbie Hugh Jackman.)</p>
<p>As for MI-3, catch it On Demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
