<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flixd: four</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanobrien.org/2009/05/flixd-four.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2009/05/flixd-four.html</link>
	<description>seanobrien.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:37:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flixd: five :: OB1og</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2009/05/flixd-four.html#comment-5273</link>
		<dc:creator>Flixd: five :: OB1og</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/?p=780#comment-5273</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is co-sponsored by the letters &#8220;M&#8221; and &#8220;S&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;S&amp;M&#8221;)? Apparently I was subconsciously only watching movies that started with those two letters last month. There is also a secondary sponsorship by Danny Boyle since I watched three of his flicks, which accounted for half of my intake this month. That&#8217;s down to six compared to the let&#8217;s-call-it-a-dozen from the previous post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is co-sponsored by the letters &#8220;M&#8221; and &#8220;S&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;S&amp;M&#8221;)? Apparently I was subconsciously only watching movies that started with those two letters last month. There is also a secondary sponsorship by Danny Boyle since I watched three of his flicks, which accounted for half of my intake this month. That&#8217;s down to six compared to the let&#8217;s-call-it-a-dozen from the previous post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.seanobrien.org/2009/05/flixd-four.html#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanobrien.org/?p=780#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>Hancock - The worst thing about Hancock is you can tell it was given the studio hatchet job. Apparently the script had been in devo in Hollywood for years and was considered &quot;epic&quot; - a whole different take on superheroes as Gods. In fact Michael Mann, who produced, was set to direct it. Then the studio kept whittling away at it - trying to bring it down to 90 minutes so they could squeeze as many showings as possible. Too bad because there was potential. And - geez - even if you didn&#039;t know the secret, they do a pretty good job of telegraphing it the second the secret shows up on screen. This was, as you say, an amusing waste of time.

Role Models - I covered this on my site and agree wholeheartedly. And that Jane Lynch is great in everything but I&#039;ll never look at a hot dog in 7-11 the same way again. 

Mr &amp; Mrs. Smith - I liked the concept and their gun battle in the middle but this was definitely lacking. Another great premise that just didn&#039;t quite knock it out of the park. Weird too as it was directed by Doug Liman who did Go and the first Bourne flick. I expect better from that dude.

Wonder Woman - I wholeheartedly agree. DC Animated is on a tear and the Green Lantern flick looks great. They&#039;ve got me jonesing for superhero flicks starring superheroes I never gave a rat&#039;s ass for in the first place - so they&#039;re doing something right. Justice League is on a whole &#039;nother plane though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hancock &#8211; The worst thing about Hancock is you can tell it was given the studio hatchet job. Apparently the script had been in devo in Hollywood for years and was considered &#8220;epic&#8221; &#8211; a whole different take on superheroes as Gods. In fact Michael Mann, who produced, was set to direct it. Then the studio kept whittling away at it &#8211; trying to bring it down to 90 minutes so they could squeeze as many showings as possible. Too bad because there was potential. And &#8211; geez &#8211; even if you didn&#8217;t know the secret, they do a pretty good job of telegraphing it the second the secret shows up on screen. This was, as you say, an amusing waste of time.</p>
<p>Role Models &#8211; I covered this on my site and agree wholeheartedly. And that Jane Lynch is great in everything but I&#8217;ll never look at a hot dog in 7-11 the same way again. </p>
<p>Mr &amp; Mrs. Smith &#8211; I liked the concept and their gun battle in the middle but this was definitely lacking. Another great premise that just didn&#8217;t quite knock it out of the park. Weird too as it was directed by Doug Liman who did Go and the first Bourne flick. I expect better from that dude.</p>
<p>Wonder Woman &#8211; I wholeheartedly agree. DC Animated is on a tear and the Green Lantern flick looks great. They&#8217;ve got me jonesing for superhero flicks starring superheroes I never gave a rat&#8217;s ass for in the first place &#8211; so they&#8217;re doing something right. Justice League is on a whole &#8216;nother plane though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

